![]() ![]() In 2011, Cheryl Cole successfully obtained a restraining order against the paparazzi when they began camping outside her home as, in her own words the experience was "intense and very annoying", and in 2009, Amy Winehouse obtained a similar injunction to Harry forbidding the paparazzi from taking pictures within 100 metres of her, her place of residence or the home of any of her family members. Whilst injunctions of this nature are deemed rare, they do not seem that rare for the celebrity. What he does mind are the methods and underhand tactics that the paparazzi have been using to try and gain that elusive headline grabbing photo. ![]() Harry's lawyers have been keen to point out that the injunction was "not a privacy injunction" and that Harry was "not trying to prevent fans approaching him in the street and taking photos". Apparently, Harry had tried to reason with the group and asked them to stop to no avail and he was forced to seek assistance from the Courts. As a result of the injunction, the group are now prevented from pursuing Harry by car or motorbike, placing him under surveillance and loitering or waiting within 50 metres of his place of residence to monitor his movements or take photographs of him in such circumstances. The injunction is against a group of paparazzo (of which four are currently still being formally identified using the DVLA) referred to in the proceedings only as "paparazzi AAA and others". The One Direction singer has succeed in obtaining what is seen as a rare Court Order banning some unnamed members of the paparazzi from pursuing him. ![]() However, this week he has hit the headlines for a different reason. One Direction's Harry Styles is no stranger to the tabloids. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |